Some video-impressions of our rally last friday can be found on http://www.ptbvhrokerspartij.nl/Â 95,000 signatures against the smoking ban presented to the MoH!MEER 95.000 HANDTEKENINGEN TEGEN HET ALGEHEEL ROOKVERBOD IN DE HORECA AANGEBODEN AAN MINISTER KLINK!
Rokers organiseren kruisvaart tegen het rookverbod
Dutch bar owners winning battle against smoking ban
July 9, 2009
J.D. Tuccille – Civil Liberties Examiner
Can put-upon minorities wage battle against government regulators and win? In the Netherlands, at least when it comes to smoking bans, the answer appears to be “yes.” After a year of widespread defiance of a law banning smoking in bars and cafes, and two court victories by bar owners, the Dutch government is backing off enforcement of the intrusive ban and effectively letting many smaller businesses set policies that work for them and their customers.
The key to the apparent victory appears to be cooperation. Bars and cafes across the country coordinated their defiance of the smoking ban after business dropped by as much as 30% in the wake of the law’s passage. To lure back customers who wanted cigarettes with their drinks, bars put the ashtrays back on the tables.
First-hand accounts even had bar patrons using table-top candle holders for their ashes in establishments that didn’t want to make their defiance too obvious.
The Dutch government fined hundreds of establishments, but couldn’t break the back of the resistance.
The law suffered perhaps fatal setbacks when courts ruled that the the government had no authority to impose total bans on small establishments that had no staff when it let larger businesses designate smoking areas. Another court ruled in favor of a bar owner who designated a store room as the (non-smoking) bar and the rest of the establishment as a smoking area.
Now, Dutch bar and cafe owners are free — at least for the time being — to establish rules that attract customers and suit their businesses.
From the beginning, smoking bans have been little more than efforts to take the preferences of some people and turn them into legal mandates for all businesses, without regard for the preferences of business owners and their customers. Smoking bans are widely popular in a country where a majority of the population doesn’t use tobacco, and their popularity has been enhanced by cloaking the issue in nice-sounding but spurious public health language that doesn’t really apply to situations involving establishments that people can choose to enter or bypass as they wish.
Ultimately, there’s little difference between mandating that all bars be non-smoking and that all bars play light jazz — just because the current crop of politicians likes it that way. It’s just easier to sell the smoking rule in a wrapper of false concern for the health of people who are capable of taking care of such matters themselves.
The Dutch example shows that, at least sometimes, efforts to mandate one-size-fits-all environments can be effectively thwarted if resistance is sufficiently widespread and determined.
email J.D.: civilliberties (at) tuccille.com
Dutch bar owners win new victory in fight against smoking ban
Jul 3, 2009
THE HAGUE — Dutch bar owners won a new victory in their fight against a smoking ban on their premises when an appeal court cleared two of them of breaking the law and quashed a 1,200 euro fine.
“The law contains no formal obligation for landlords of cafes, restaurants and hotels without staff to implement a smoking ban,” the appeal court at Leeuwarden in the northern Netherlands said in a statement.
It overturned the verdict handed down in a lower court against the pair from Groningen who became the first to be prosecuted following the introduction of the nationwide ban a year ago.
In May the appeals court of Den Bosch, in the southern Netherlands, upheld the acquittal of the two owners of the Victoria cafe in Breda, near the Belgian border.
“The court finds that the (ban) is partly non-binding, as it lacks legal grounding” regarding establishments with no staff, said a court statement.
The ban on smoking in the hotel, restaurant and catering industry had sought to protect staff from the dangers of second-hand smoke inhalation.
Several thousand small bars and cafes in the Netherlands united late last year to defy the smoking ban and create a joint legal defense fund, arguing they lacked the floor space and money to erect separate smoking-only areas.
A recent Dutch health ministry study found that 62 percent of Dutch cafes saw a drop in business in October and November 2008, compared with a year earlier, on account of the smoking ban.
Breda court overturns café smoking ban
Click here to see updates of the trip and see the photos!
———————-
SMOKING BAN
AMSTERDAM AND LAREN, THE NETHERLANDS
JUNE 30, 2008 JUNE 26, 2008
NATURAL WITH ENGLISH AND DUTCH SPEECH
DURATION:02:53
SOURCE:REUTERS
FEED HISTORY:+NEW EU (1515GMT)
INTRO: Dutch bar owners sue state over July 1st smoking ban.
1st smoking ban and taking the state to court on the first day the ban is due
to take effect. The Netherlands is amongst the latest EU countries to apply a
smoking ban.
(EU) LAREN, THE NETHERLANDS (JUNE 26, 2008) (REUTERS – ACCESS ALL)
1. FOUNDER OF “SAVE THE SMALL BARS” FOUNDATION, TON WURTZ
LIGHTING CIGAR
2. TON WURTZ EXHALING
3. CUSTOMERS IN AN OLD BAR
4. COOKED EGGS AND BOTTLES OF WHISKEY AND RUM ON SHELF
5. CUSTOMERS CHATTING
6. WAITER POURING BEER FROM TAP
7. FULL GLASS OF BEER
8. (SOUNDBITE) (English) FOUNDER OF “SAVE THE SMALL BARS”
FOUNDATION, TON WURTZ, SAYING:
“The legal basis of the smoking ban is that there is no
discrimination in this law and we say, well, there is a discrimination in this
law because the difference between big bars and small bars. A big bar can have
this [smokers] facility and a small bar, 30-35 square metres cannot do that in
its space.”
9. SMALL BAR WITH CUSTOMERS
10. (SOUNDBITE) (Dutch), BETTY, CUSTOMER, SAYING:
“I feel very sad. This is for me a big social happening, smoking
and drinking in a cafe, and I can’t do it anymore. Nothing can be done about
it. EU has made a decision and we are the last country, so there is nothing
left to decide anymore.”
11. WAITER PASSING BY WALL FULL OF OAK BARRELS
12. (SOUNDBITE) (English), TON WURTZ, FOUNDER OF “SAVE THE SMALL
BARS” FOUNDATION, SAYING:
“A little bar in Holland has a social function and what you are
doing is you rip out that of the society through this stupid law.”
13. CUSTOMER WITH A FISHING STICK WALKS THROUGH BAR
14. (SOUNDBITE) (English) CUSTOMER FROM IRELAND, ADRIAN, SAYING:
“A lot of places had to close down in Ireland. What I am glad
about Amsterdam is that the ban is actually on tobacco, it’s not on cannabis,
so it’s gonna be quite difficult to enforce it.”
15. VAPOURISER BEING FILLED WITH PURE TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL (THC), ACTIVE
INGREDIENT IN CANNABIS
16. COUPLE SITTING IN A COFFEE SHOP
17. VAPOURISER
18. MAN INHALING SMOKE FROM VAPOURISER
17. (SOUNDBITE) (English) ) ARJEN ROSKAM, COFFEE SHOP OWNER, SAYING:
“The European community cannot ban marijuana smoking, because it’s
an illegal substance, so European community first has to legalise cannabis
before they can ban it.”
18. FEMALE FINGERS WITH MANICURED NAILS CRUSHING MARIJUANA LEAVES
19. TATTOOED WOMAN FILLING NARGILA PIPE WITH MARIJUANA
20. MAN SMOKING NARGILA PIPE
small Dutch bar-owners, who are taking the government to court for imposing a
smoking ban which they say discriminates them and their businesses.
The court appearance will be on Tuesday (July 1), the day the ban first
comes into force in The Netherlands.
Unlike some countries which have imposed a total ban on all
establishments serving food and drink the Dutch law does allow for larger
places to set up a separate smoking section.
Owners of small bars say they simply don’t have the room to do that and
fear they will lose their smoking customers to bigger bars.
Wurtz says he has studied the effect of smoking bans on bars in
Germany, Britain and Ireland where he says many places have had to shut down
as a direct result of the law.
“The legal basis of the smoking ban is that there is no
discrimination in this law and we say, well, there is a discrimination in this
law because the difference between big bars and small bars. A big bar can have
this [smokers] facility and a small bar, 30-35 square meters cannot do that in
its space,” Wurtz says.
Some customers also think they will lose an important aspect of
socialising with the ban. Some people here believe the move was instigated by
the European Commission. However the EU has maintained that it is up to
individual member states.
“I feel very sad. This is for me a big social happening, smoking
and drinking in a cafe, and I can’t do it anymore. Nothing can be done about
it. EU has made a decision and we are the last country, so there is nothing
left to decide anymore,” says Betty, a customer.
Wurtz agrees. He thinks the smoking ban will rip Dutch society apart
and that the country will lose an important form of social interaction.
“A little bar in Holland has a social function and what you are
doing is you rip out that of the society through this stupid law,” he
said to Reuters.
The government says it wants to protect people working in the catering
industry some of whom are exposed to cigarette smoke every day of their
working lives whereas customers can choose whether or not to be in the
vicinity of a smoker.
Some bar-goers hope the famous Dutch marijuana-selling coffeeshops
could save the day for tobacco smokers.
“A lot of places had to close down in Ireland. What I am glad
about Amsterdam is that the ban is actually on tobacco, it’s not on cannabis,
so it’s gonna be quite difficult to enforce it,” says Adrian, a native of
Ireland.
But coffeeshops don’t mind the tobacco ban as they offer substitutes
for tobacco ready to use: bongs, pipes and vapourisers. Connoisseurs say using
a vapouriser to inhale pure tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient
in cannabis, is the healthiest way to consume cannabis. It is recommended by
practitioners in Germany to treat severe pain in cancer patients and people
living with AIDS.
Coffeeshop owner Arjen Roskam does not feel threatened by the smoking
ban because it does not apply to cannabis or marijuana.
“The European community cannot ban marijuana smoking, because it’s
an illegal substance, so European community first has to legalise cannabis
before they can ban it,” he says.
From tomorrow July 1, the Netherlands becomes the only country in the
world where its ok to smoke pure cannabis in public places and cafes but not
ok to smoke tobacco.
95,000 signatures against the smoking ban presented to the MoH!
MEER 95.000 HANDTEKENINGEN TEGEN
HET ALGEHEEL ROOKVERBOD IN DE HORECA
AANGEBODEN AAN MINISTER KLINK!
Kruisvaart tegen het rookverbod
WIJ ZIJN HET SPUUGZAT!
We had a wonderfull surprise action against the smoking ban plans in Amsterdam last sunday. It was the main event during our ‘crusader trip against the smoking ban’. On boats we have been driving through the Amsterdam canals (‘grachten’) while playing an anti-smoking ban song loudly from two boats and producing clouds of smoke. We got a tremendous media coverage and even were invited to start a weblog on one of the Dutch main TV media’s websites.
Pictures can be found on our site: http://www.forces-nl.org/modules.php?name=News&file;=article&sid;=1516
A TV report can be found here: http://www..at5.nl/speler_at5nieuws.asp?newsid=27948
The song that was played from the boat: http://www.antirookverbod.nl/downloads/antirookverbod.mp3 (anti-smoking ban song)
As a result of our crusade action, an enormous petition action has been started that tries to gather 300.000 signatures against the smoking ban plans.
6/14/07
P E R S B E R I C H T
Noch de café-eigenaars noch de bezoekers begrijpen niet waarom alternatieven niet bespreekbaar zijn, zoals o.a. ventilatie, waarbij volgens TNO de binnenlucht voor meer dan 90% gezuiverd wordt. Met andere woorden: de binnenlucht is schoner dan de buitenlucht.
Naar schatting 98% van de ondervraagden Café-eigenaars verwerpen het plan van de Minister en Horeca Nederland. 75% van de ondervraagden bezoekers van Horeca gelegenheden vinden het onacceptabel dat er maatregelen over rokers worden uitgevaardigd zonder daarin geraadpleegd te worden.
Op 8 juli wordt er door Stichting Rokersbelangen, Forces Nederland en Partij tegen Betutteling bij aankomst van de actieboot een grootscheepse actie gevoerd door rokers en niet-rokers tegen het voorgenomen beleid van Minister Klink .
Een muziekband zal de dag opleuken met een hiervoor speciaal geschreven anti-rookverbod lied .
De manifestatie zal starten om half acht op een nog nader aan te geven adres in Amsterdam.


WIJ ZIJN HET SPUUGZAT!