People Smoke More Where Packets Show NO Branding

0

The World

Smokers buy cheaper cigarettes in plain packaging…

People smoke more in countries where cigarette packets show NO branding: Smokers buy cheaper cigarettes in plain packaging

 • Data from tobacco industry says plain packaging may increase smoking

• Packet branding ban was introduced to Australia on December 1, 2012

• Lack of branding is designed to make packets less attractive

• But tobacco sales in Australia increased despite brand-free packets

• Research reveals people now buy larger quantities of cheaper cigarettes

• Loose tobacco sales increased 3.4 per cent and more people use roll ups

• UK has not set a date on a potential ban on branded packaging in the UK

• Parliament has ordered a review into whether a ban would be effective

Unbranded cigarettes may not stop people from smoking according to new research in Australia where cigarette packets are already unbranded.

Industry data from Australia has warned plain packaging could lead to a rise in the sale of cigarette packs, because smokers, and potential smokers, will no longer care about buying expensive brands.

The industry data suggests the amount of tobacco delivered to retailers has actually risen since the move to plain packaging was introduced in 2012.

Health campaigners have been vying for the plain packages all over the world, saying the move will protect children and potential new smokers who are attracted to branded packaging.

The thinking is that potential smokers are less likely to buy packs of cigarettes if they are unbranded.

The data comes as leaders of the industry have announced that they intend to present an independent report to ministers, calling for a review of the banning of branded cigarette packs.

Philip Morris International, the manufacturers of Marlboro cigarettes, released data from Australia, which introduced the ban on plain packaging on December 1, 2012, which suggests that they have had a rise in deliveries of tobacco for the first time in five years.

Their data suggests that unbranded cigarette packets have reversed the downward trend of the fall in people buying cigarettes, and that people may potentially be buying more.

It says that in 2013 after a year of unbranded packaging, tobacco firms in Australia sold the equivalent of 21.074 cigarettes – a rise of 0.3 per cent after four years of bad sales, while the sales of loose tobacco used in roll-up cigarettes increased 3.4 per cent.

Health campaigners and anti-smoking groups previously said they were concerned about this potential result from instituting unbranded packaging.

However, they also say a ban on branded packaging is not enough, and that harsher taxes to increase the price of cigarettes should also be instituted to dissuade people even more.

The proposal for plain packs in the UK was intended to reduce the amount of children and teenagers that would ordinarily be drawn to smoking because of branded packaging, which can make a cigarette packet seem more attractive.

Parliament has been toying with the possibility of a UK ban, and in November 2013 they ordered an independent review of branded packaging to find out whether the ban would be effective.

However, so far the issue is still under consideration, and no date has been given as to when a ban might be introduced in the UK.

The UK wanted to wait for the results of the Australian ban on branded packaging in 2012 before making a decision.

Deborah Arnott, director of Action on Smoking and Health believes that the data is a deliberate attempt to promote the agenda of the cigarette and tobacco companies.

She said: ‘We are repeatedly seeing attempts to undermine the case for standardised packaging.

‘It is about dissuading them from taking up smoking – and one year’s data from Australia about delivery levels of tobacco tells us nothing about that.

Eoin Dadis, director of corporate affairs for Philip Morris in Britain believes that the implications that the data from his company bring to light need to be examined.

He said: ‘If people are buying cheaper stuff, maybe they’re smoking more of it.

‘It’s definitely a point of interest and that’s something that absolutely needs to be explored because that’s the counter of what this policy is seeking to achieve.’

UK RULES ON TOBACCO SALES AND ADVERTISING

Currently branded packaging in the UK is still allowed, and the Government has not set a date for the potential ban of branded packaging.

However, parliament has been reviewing the issue, and have requested an independent review into whether banning branded packaging would be successful.

The key facts on tobacco sales in the UK are:

• Tobacco displays in large shops were banned in April 6 2012

• Smaller shops will have to remove their tobacco displays by 2015

• The number of adult smokers is above 21 per cent

• Ministers have promised to reduce this to 18.5 per cent by 2015

The Labour Party banned all advertising of tobacco products as a part of the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act in 2002, which banned tobacco advertising in the following order:

• 14 February 2003 – General advertising

• 14 May 2003 – Promotions

• 30 July 2003 – Sponsorship of sporting events within the UK

• May 2004 – Particular advertisements in tobacconists

• 21 December 2004 – Large adverts in shops, pubs and clubs

• 31 July 2005 – Sponsorship of excepted global events and brand sharing

 

Originally written By: LUKE GARRATT

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More